Back to Services

1 July 2026 — 11 weeks away

New NDIS registration framework requirements come into effect. Website compliance is publicly visible — it is one of the first things the Commission checks. Build and review time is 2–3 weeks minimum.

NDIS Provider Services

Compliance-Ready Websites for Registered NDIS Providers

Your website is doing the marketing job. That is not the same as the compliance job. Most registered NDIS provider websites are missing the disclosures, policies, and pathways the Commission expects to see — and the gap between what looks professional and what is actually compliant is where registrations are put at risk.

We build and upgrade NDIS provider websites with compliance-aware content written to the Commission's actual expectations — not generic copy that sounds right but misses the specifics.

What Most Provider Websites Are Missing

We audit provider websites against the publicly visible requirements under the NDIS registration framework. These are the gaps we find on nearly every site we check — each one a visible risk as July 1 approaches.

No complaints process

How participants lodge a complaint, what happens after, and the escalation pathway must be publicly visible.

No participant rights section

Participants' rights under the NDIS — safety, dignity, choice, and control — must be clearly documented and findable.

No privacy policy

Registered providers collect participant data. A public privacy policy referencing NDIS participant data obligations is required.

No incident reporting pathway

Participants and families must be able to find how incidents are reported, including direct Commission contact details.

No SIRS disclosure

The Serious Incident Response Scheme must be named, explained, and referenced correctly — including what counts as a reportable incident.

No worker screening statement

That all workers hold a valid NDIS Worker Screening Check must be publicly stated — not assumed.

What We Deliver

Every section is written specifically for your registration — not adapted from a template. The wording matters. The Commission knows the difference between copy that covers the requirement and copy that just sounds like it does.

SIRS disclosure — correctly named, correctly referenced, Commission contact included
Worker screening statement — specific to your registration, not generic
Participant complaint process — structured, with timeframes and escalation pathway
Participant rights section — rights under the NDIS Practice Standards, plain English
Privacy policy — written for NDIS participant data obligations
Incident reporting entry point — how to report, who to contact, Commission details

Why the Wording Matters

SIRS disclosure is not just a paragraph about incidents. It must name the Serious Incident Response Scheme, state that the provider participates in SIRS, define what counts as a reportable incident under the NDIS (Incident Management and Reportable Incidents) Rules 2018, and include how participants or families can report directly to the Commission.

Generic copy that covers some of that usually misses the rest. The same applies to worker screening statements, complaint pathways, and participant rights sections — each has specific elements the Commission checks for.

We write to what the Commission actually looks for. Not what reads well. Not what other providers have on their sites. What the framework requires.

How It Works

1

Audit

We review your existing site against the Commission's publicly visible requirements. You get a clear picture of exactly what is missing and what needs to be written.

2

Write & Build

We write every compliance section specifically for your provider registration — not adapted from a template. Every section is scoped to what your site actually needs.

3

Review & Publish

You review everything before it goes live. Once approved, we publish and you have a record of what was updated and when. Updates are included as requirements change.

Registration is at risk — not just reputation

The Commission audits provider websites as part of its registration oversight. Missing compliance disclosures are a visible, documentable gap. For providers delivering high-support services — SIL, accommodation, support coordination — the consequences of a failed audit are not administrative. They are operational.

Ready to make your site audit-ready?

We run the audit first — no cost. You see exactly what is missing. Then you decide.

This service provides website content writing and development support for registered NDIS providers. It does not constitute legal advice and does not guarantee audit outcomes or registration compliance. Providers should seek independent legal or compliance advice for their specific obligations.